Accepted Species
First published in: Linzer Biol. Beitr. 28(2): 1056. (1996).
Etymology: Whitelock (2002) stated that, according to authority Bruno Wallnöfer (pers. comm.), the specific epithet has no meaning. Most workers believe that ‘urep’ is simply an anagram of Peru, where this species is endemic. (Jones 2002, Whitelock 2002, Hill & Stevenson 2012) [source]
Distribution: Peru (Huánuco)
IUCN Red List Conservation Status:
Endangered B2ab(iii)
References (6)
Comment(s) | ||
---|---|---|
2015
|
Calonje M, Morales G, López-Gallego C, Roldán FJ. 2015. A taxonomic revision of Zamia montana and Zamia oligodonta, with notes on their conservation status. Phytotaxa 192
(4): 279-289.
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.192.4.5.
[DOI]
|
Included in key
|
2022
|
Haynes JL. 2022. Etymological compendium of cycad names. Phytotaxa 550
(1)
: 1-31.
|
|
2012
|
Hill K, Stevenson DW. 2012. The Cycad Pages, Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Australia [Archived at archived.org].
[
accessed 2024 Jun 30
].
https://web.archive.org/web/20200924224627/https://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/PlantNet/cycad/index.html.
[Reference]
|
|
2003
|
Jones DL.
2003. Cycads of the World.
2nd Edition.
Washington D.C.:
Smithsonian Institution.
456 p.
|
|
1996
|
Wallnofer B. 1996. New or noteworthy species of Aegiphila, Styrax and Zamia. Linzer Biol. Beitr. 28
(2)
: 1053-1060.
|
Protologue description
|
2002
|
Whitelock LM.
2002. The Cycads.
Portland, OR:
Timber Press.
374 p.
|
|